Swiss Reference Letter Phrases Decoded
Swiss employers are legally required to word reference letters benevolently (Art. 330a of the Swiss Code of Obligations). That is why a coded language has developed: a sentence that sounds like praise in a literal translation can actually mean an average or poor grade. Look up the German phrases from your Arbeitszeugnis and see what Swiss HR really reads.
Decode a sentence from your reference letter
Paste a German sentence from your Arbeitszeugnis. It is matched against 539 known Swiss reference-letter codes right in your browser – nothing is uploaded or stored.
Performance & satisfaction
How satisfied the employer was with your work – the core of the Swiss grade.
«absolut loyal und integer»
This is particularly strong praise for managers, highlighting complete trustworthiness and honesty.
6.0«bedauern diesen Entschluss ausserordentlich»
A very significant loss for the company, confirming excellent overall performance (grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
6.0«bedauern sein Ausscheiden ausserordentlich»
Signals a very significant loss for the firm and confirms excellent performance (grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
6.0«bedauern seinen Weggang ausserordentlich»
This reflects genuine regret over losing a top performer.
6.0«Das Arbeitsverhältnis endet per 30. Juni 2023»
An abrupt end without giving a reason or expressing regret suggests a immediate termination, garden leave, or severe conflict despite an otherwise top-grade reference, devaluing the overall document to a grade 5.0.
6.0«freuen uns auf eine weiterhin erfolgreiche Kooperation»
This demonstrates a strong commitment from the employer and confirms the wish to retain the employee, corresponding to grade 6 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«fuehrte ihr Team stets zu Hoechstleistungen»
Reflects excellent and highly effective leadership performance (grade 6 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
6.0«verfügt über hervorragendes Fachwissen»
This signals absolute expertise in the field, representing grade 6.
6.0«war auch höchsten Belastungen jederzeit gewachsen»
This signals that the employee remains highly effective even under extreme stress (grade 6).
6.0«in jeder Hinsicht und ausnahmslos zu unserer vollsten Zufriedenheit»
This represents the best possible performance evaluation, corresponding to grade 6 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«zeigte jederzeit höchstes Engagement»
This represents top-level performance and motivation (grade 6).
6.0«jederzeit zu unserer vollsten Zufriedenheit»
This signals top-tier performance, corresponding to grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«arbeitete stets äusserst selbstständig»
This signals an flawless working style requiring no day-to-day supervision (grade 6).
6.0«stets deutlich übertroffen»
Outstanding, well above-average achievement of goals, representing grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«stets in allerbester Weise»
The employee displayed outstanding professional expertise and implementation.
6.0«stets mit äusserster Sorgfalt»
This indicates an outstanding quality of work, corresponding to grade 6 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«stets zu unserer vollsten Zufriedenheit»
An outstanding performance evaluation, representing grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«stets zu unserer vollsten Zufriedenheit erfüllt und unsere Erwartungen oft übertroffen»
This indicates outstanding, far above-average performance corresponding to top grade 6.0.
6.0«stets zur vollsten Zufriedenheit»
This represents grade 6 (the absolute top grade) on the Swiss 1–6 scale.
6.0«überraschte uns immer wieder mit innovativen Ideen»
Very high initiative, outstanding creativity, and a proactive working style, corresponding to grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«vollste Anerkennung»
Swiss HR understands this phrase as a signal of maximum satisfaction and top performance (grade 6 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
6.0«wegen seiner umgänglichen Art im Team sehr geschätzt»
He was nice, but tended to adapt rather than show leadership qualities, or was considered somewhat eccentric.
6.0«Wir bedauern sein Ausscheiden ausserordentlich, danken ihm für seine stets hervorragende Arbeit»
This is a top-tier, highly appreciative closing statement confirming excellent performance (grade 6.0 on the Swiss scale).
6.0«setzte sich stets für die Belange der Belegschaft ein»
Coded hint at active works council or union involvement, or acting as a troublemaker from the employer's perspective, despite a high rating (grade 5.5).
5.5«Den üblichen Arbeitsanfall bewältigte er gut»
The employee handled normal workload demands well but reached his limits during peak periods (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«verfügt über fundiertes Fachwissen»
This indicates solid, above-average professional knowledge (grade 5).
5.0«Gegenüber unseren Kunden und Vorgesetzten»
By deliberately omitting colleagues from the conduct section, it is clear the employee was an egotistical lone wolf who caused friction in the team (grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Ihre Pünktlichkeit war stets vorbildlich»
Basic expectations are emphasized because there were few notable achievements to mention.
5.0«jederzeit zu unserer vollen Zufriedenheit»
Signals good performance, corresponding to grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
5.0«neue Herausforderung ausserhalb unseres Unternehmens anzunehmen»
The resignation was submitted correctly and on the employee's own initiative, corresponding to grade 5.0.
5.0«Pünktlichkeit und seine Zuverlässigkeit bei der Erstellung von internen Berichten waren vorbildlich»
The employer is distracting from poor sales performance by emphasizing trivial duties.
5.0«seine Pünktlichkeit war jederzeit vorbildlich»
The employee was punctual, but achieved no other noteworthy performance, resulting in a grade 5.0 on the Swiss scale.
5.0«arbeitete sehr selbstständig»
This denotes a good level of independence on the job (grade 5).
5.0«war stets belastbar»
This demonstrates good stress resistance and resilience (grade 5).
5.0«stets vorbildliche Pünktlichkeit»
Emphasises a baseline duty, which can signal a lack of actual work accomplishments, mapped to grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
5.0«stets zu unserer vollen Zufriedenheit»
Good performance evaluation (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«stets zur vollen Zufriedenheit»
This corresponds to grade 5 (good) on the Swiss 1–6 scale.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Arbeitskollegen sowie unseren externen Partnern war stets vorbildlich»
This shows good team and client conduct, but intentionally omitting superiors points to severe conflict with management or insubordination, reducing the overall impact.
5.0«verlässt unser Unternehmen per 31. August 2023»
An abrupt, cold closing sentence without any polite formulas, pointing to an immediate dismissal or severe breach of trust.
5.0«vertrat stets eine eigene Meinung und setzte sich für ihre Ansichten ein»
The employee was argumentative, opinionated, or difficult to integrate into the existing team.
5.0«weiterhin Erfolg»
The employee was successful and is expected to remain successful in the future (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«wertvolle Mitarbeit und das stets gute Engagement»
Confirms good, solid performance with no major shortcomings (grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Wir bedauern ihren Entschluss ausserordentlich»
This phrase indicates a major loss for the company, confirming very good overall performance (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Wir danken ihr für die geleistete Arbeit und wünschen ihr viel Erfolg»
Although performance was good, the absence of an expression of regret ('Wir bedauern...') signals that the company is not sorry to see the employee leave (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«wünschen ihm für die Zukunft weiterhin viel Erfolg»
This clause confirms that the employee was successful in his past work, corresponding to a grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
5.0«setzte sein Fachwissen effektiv ein»
This represents average technical knowledge corresponding to grade 4.5.
4.5«suchte stets den aktiven Dialog mit dem Team»
The employee talked a lot and was keen on discussions, but rarely got to the point quickly, representing grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«trat engagiert für ihre Ansichten ein»
The employee was opinionated, argumentative, and resistant to compromise, corresponding to a grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«Wir danken ihm für seine Mitarbeit und wünschen ihm viel Erfolg»
The complete absence of regret over the departure indicates that the employer was not unhappy to see him leave, corresponding to grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«zu unserer vollen Zufriedenheit»
Satisfactory performance lacking a consistency signal, corresponding to grade 4.5 on the Swiss scale.
4.5«zur vollen Zufriedenheit»
This reflects a solid, average performance corresponding to grade 4.5 on the Swiss scale.
4.5«ausserordentlich loyale Mitarbeiterin»
She showed little initiative and had no independent opinions, equating to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«durch eine pünktliche Arbeitsweise auszeichnete»
The employee was punctual but did not excel in any other performance area (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«durch seine gesellige Art»
Swiss HR reads this as a hint of excessive alcohol consumption or excessive distraction caused by private chats during work (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«ein umgänglicher Kollege»
The employee was pleasant and sociable but did not stand out through work performance, potentially engaging in too much non-work socializing, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«entsprachen im Allgemeinen unseren Erwartungen»
Performance was mediocre and showed temporary deficiencies, corresponding to grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Er war pünktlich»
Highlighting self-evident basic duties like punctuality suggests notable performance deficiencies in key responsibilities (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«erledigte Aufgaben ordnungsgemäss»
This indicates working strictly to rule without personal initiative (grade 4.0).
4.0«erledigte die ihm übertragenen Aufgaben selbstständig»
Can be interpreted as an indication of a lone wolf who failed to integrate into a team, corresponding to grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«erledigte die ihm übertragenen Aufgaben zu unserer Zufriedenheit»
Sufficient but purely average performance without any special enthusiasm (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«erledigte die ihr übertragenen Aufgaben im Wesentlichen selbstständig»
The employee frequently required guidance or supervision and did not work fully independently.
4.0«erledigte er zu unserer Zufriedenheit»
Sufficient performance, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«erledigte seine persönlichen Aufgaben stets zuverlässig»
The employee focused solely on his own work while neglecting leadership and teamwork responsibilities (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«für die Belange der Belegschaft stets ein offenes Ohr»
The employee was distracted by works council or trade union matters rather than focusing on his actual duties (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«im gegenseitigen Einverständnis aufgelöst»
Signals a disguised dismissal or severance agreement due to unsatisfactory performance, representing grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«im Rahmen der Vorgaben»
This indicates that he displayed no initiative and did only the absolute minimum required, corresponding to a grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«In ruhigen Zeiten arbeitete sie zuverlässig»
The employee could not handle pressure and lost control during busy periods.
4.0«insbesondere auch viel Erfolg»
Success is wished for the future because it was lacking in the past, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«korrekt»
Signals that the employee did only the bare minimum without delivering a convincing performance, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«mit vollem Verständnis bei der Arbeit»
The employee was passive, understanding tasks in theory but showing no personal initiative or drive (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«ordnungsgemäss»
The employee showed no initiative, working in a purely bureaucratic manner without enthusiasm.
4.0«ordnungsgemäss erledigte»
Tasks were carried out in a bureaucratically correct manner but without personal initiative or special effort, reflecting grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«ordnungsgemäss und im Wesentlichen zu unserer Zufriedenheit»
This represents adequate to barely passable performance without any personal initiative, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«ordnungsgemäss und stets zu unserer Zufriedenheit»
Performance was adequate and met basic expectations, but lacked initiative or exceptional results (grade 4.0 on the Swiss scale).
4.0«sehr kommunikative Mitarbeiterin, die sich rege am Austausch im Hause beteiligte»
The employee was excessively talkative, distracted others, and gossiped, representing grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«stets äusserst pünktlich»
This is a distraction phrase indicating that punctuality was highlighted because there were no positive performance achievements to report.
4.0«stets bemüht, die Kundenbedürfnisse zu verstehen»
The employee failed to effectively engage with customers or achieve successful sales, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«stets bemüht, die Termine und Deadlines einzuhalten»
The employee had significant time management problems and frequently missed deadlines, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«stets korrekt»
Formal, but distant and impersonal conduct (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«stets puenktlich, aeusserst ordentlich und hielt sich genau an die vorgegebenen Arbeitszeiten»
Emphasising basic baseline expectations signals that actual job performance was weak (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«stets selbstständig»
Signals a lone wolf who lacks teamwork skills, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«stets zu unserer Zufriedenheit»
Signals a sufficient performance, corresponding to grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«trug aktiv zur Verbesserung des Betriebsklimas bei»
Swiss HR understands this to mean the employee was more interested in gossip and partying than in actual work (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«verfügt über das notwendige Fachwissen»
This indicates that knowledge was just adequate to meet basic requirements (grade 4.0).
4.0«viel Glück»
Luck is needed by those who lack capability, while 'success' is omitted (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«war stets um eine korrekte Erfüllung der ihm übertragenen Aufgaben besorgt»
The employee did not actually fulfil his tasks, but merely looked concerned about them (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Wir trennen uns von Herrn Peter»
Indicates a unilateral dismissal by the employer due to inadequate performance (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«wünschen ihm auf seinem weiteren Lebensweg alles Gute»
Omitting a wish for professional success implies a lack of confidence in his career abilities, representing a very cold farewell at grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«wünschen ihr für den weiteren Lebensweg alles Gute»
The omission of the word 'success' reduces the closing formula to a merely sufficient rating (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«wünschen ihr für die Zukunft alles Gute»
This is a standard closing formula that omits 'much success', pointing to an average overall assessment.
4.0«wusste sich in unserem Unternehmen stets gut zu verkaufen»
Swiss HR reads this as a signal that the employee was an opportunist who exaggerated his accomplishments and appeared arrogant (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«zeichnete sich durch eine aussergewöhnliche Pünktlichkeit aus»
Apart from punctuality, there were no positive accomplishments to report, making this a distraction tactic (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«zeigte ein gutes Verständnis für seine Arbeit»
The employee possessed theoretical understanding but failed to translate it into strong practical output (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«zeigte für alle Aspekte der Arbeit grosses Interesse»
The employee was interested, but did not necessarily master the work successfully or independently, equating to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«zeigte grosses Interesse an der Verkaufsberatung»
The employee made an effort but had no notable sales success or was unsuited for advisory work, signaling grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«zeigte stets grosses Interesse an der Akquisition»
Although the employee made an effort, he was unable to achieve any notable sales or deals, signalling an unsuccessful performance (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«zur unserer Zufriedenheit»
The employee's performance was merely adequate to borderline insufficient.
4.0«zu unserer Zufriedenheit»
This represents a bare pass (grade 4.0) on the Swiss 1–6 scale.
4.0«zur Zufriedenheit»
Signals a sufficient but merely average performance, corresponding to grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Zusammenarbeit mit ihr war stets korrekt»
The employee was difficult, distant, inflexible, or argumentative (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«war ein zuverlässiger Mitarbeiter»
This reflects a bare pass (grade 4.0), as reliability alone is expected.
4.0«alles Gute, auch im finanziellen Bereich»
This strongly hints at financial irregularities, cash shortages, or a lack of commercial acumen, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«am Telefon stets freundlich»
Signals that the employee was polite but failed to resolve problems or close sales, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«anpassungsfähigen und geselligen Art»
Swiss HR views this as a code for a follower without strong opinions who wasted time gossiping, with "sociable" often hinting at alcohol or discipline issues (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«arbeitete mit grossem Fleiss»
The employee tried hard and invested time, but was ultimately inefficient and unsuccessful.
3.5«ausgeprägte eigene Meinung»
This indicates insubordination, stubbornness, and a lack of teamwork, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«auszeichnete durch eine exzellente Pünktlichkeit»
Shifting focus to trivialities due to a lack of outstanding leadership or work achievements, signalling grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«bei den Auszubildenden äusserst beliebt»
Signals a lack of authority and assertiveness, acting as a friend rather than a respected authority figure (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«bemühte sich, den Anforderungen gerecht zu werden»
The goodwill was there, but actual performance was insufficient, equating to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«bemühte sich stets, den Anforderungen der Position gerecht zu werden»
The employee failed to meet the requirements of a management position, demonstrating effort without success.
3.5«bemühte sich stets, den Anforderungen gerecht zu werden»
The employee showed willingness but lacked ability; overall performance was insufficient.
3.5«bemühte sich stets, die ihr übertragenen Aufgaben zu unserer Zufriedenheit zu erledigen»
The employee tried hard, but her actual performance was unsatisfactory or flawed, reflecting a grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale.
3.5«bewies bei ihrer Arbeit ein gesundes Selbstvertrauen»
The employee acted arrogantly and showed a lack of ability to accept criticism, representing a grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale.
3.5«das nötige Quäntchen Glück»
The employee was unsuccessful in his job and relied on luck because he lacked professional competence, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«den Anforderungen im Wesentlichen zu entsprechen»
The employee did not satisfy the job requirements, indicating unsatisfactory performance.
3.5«Diskretion»
Highlights a standard baseline expectation for the role, pointing to deficiencies in core duties (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«durch ihre grosse Geselligkeit zur Verbesserung des Betriebsklimas beizutragen»
This implies excessive alcohol consumption or disruptive socialising during working hours, representing grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«durch seine gesellige Art geschätzt»
Signals a lack of professional distance toward subordinates, a tendency to gossip, or alcohol consumption, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«endet im gegenseitigen Einvernehmen»
Strongly suggests termination by the employer or a forced severance agreement (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«entsprach den an ihn gestellten Anforderungen»
Working strictly by the book without above-average performance (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«er bemühte sich, den Anforderungen gerecht zu werden»
The employee was not equal to the requirements and his efforts were unsuccessful (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«Er war stets pünktlich»
Nothing positive could be said about the employee except punctuality, indicating a lack of commitment and grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«erledigte die ihm übertragenen Aufgaben stets ordnungsgemäss»
This indicates a bureaucratic, purely mechanical way of working without personal initiative, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«führte alle Arbeiten aus, die ihr zugewiesen wurden»
This indicates a total lack of initiative, signaling she did the bare minimum and grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«führte sein Team mit grossem Elan»
The employee was active, but his leadership style was unstructured, chaotic, or lacking in success (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«für die Belange seiner Mitarbeitenden ein, für die er stets volles Verständnis hatte»
The employee lacked assertiveness as a manager, preferring team popularity over fulfilling his leadership duties, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«gesellige Art war er im Team sehr beliebt»
Points to a lack of professionalism, excessive private socializing during work hours, or drinking problems, equating to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«ging bei der Problemlösung gerne eigene Wege»
The employee acted arbitrarily, failed to follow guidelines or specifications, and ignored instructions (grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale).
3.5«grosse Pünktlichkeit und Zuverlässigkeit beim Eintreffen»
Emphasising obvious basic requirements signals a lack of actual work performance, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«grosses Einfühlungsvermögen für die Belange der Arbeiter»
The employee either sought inappropriate personal contacts or was heavily involved in union activity against the company.
3.5«hatte für die Anliegen seiner Mitarbeiter stets ein offenes Ohr»
The employee lacked assertiveness and allowed subordinates to distract them from primary goals, reflecting grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«im Allgemeinen den Anforderungen»
Performance was inadequate with significant deficiencies, reflecting grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«im Grossen und Ganzen zu unserer Zufriedenheit»
This corresponds to grade 3.5, signaling clear performance shortcomings.
3.5«im Grossen und Ganzen ordnungsgemäss»
The employee's performance was unsatisfactory with significant deficiencies, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«im Rahmen seiner Fähigkeiten stets bemüht»
Performance was insufficient, as the employee was not up to the role's requirements technically or personally (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«im Rahmen seiner Kenntnisse»
The employee's professional knowledge was insufficient for the position.
3.5«im Rahmen seiner Möglichkeiten belastbar»
The employee was unable to handle normal operational pressure and quickly became overwhelmed, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«im Wesentlichen ordnungsgemäss»
Signals deficient execution where errors occurred regularly, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«im Wesentlichen zu unserer Zufriedenheit»
The employee barely met expectations and serious shortcomings were present, representing grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«In Zeiten normaler Arbeitsbelastung»
The employee was unable to cope with stress or heavy workloads.
3.5«insbesondere auch Erfolg»
The employee had no success in the role, which is why it is explicitly wished for the future, representing grade 3.5.
3.5«insbesondere das nötige Quäntchen Glück»
This cynical phrasing implies that the employee lacks competence and will only succeed through pure luck.
3.5«zeigte Interesse an»
This is a classic coded phrase meaning interest was present, but competence was lacking (grade 3.5).
3.5«jederzeit kameradschaftlich»
Swiss HR reads this as a lack of professional distance towards subordinates, signaling an overly informal buddy-type leadership style (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«kameradschaftlich»
This suggests overly informal behavior, lack of professionalism, or excessive distraction, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«kontaktfreudige und gesellige Art»
This implies that the employee engaged in excessive chatting and distracted others from work, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«mit grossem Fleiss anpackte»
This indicates that while the employee worked hard, they were unsuccessful in execution (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«nach seinen eigenen Vorstellungen»
The employee was unreliable in administrative matters and disregarded instructions, equating to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«sauber und hygienische»
Focuses on a self-evident requirement, signaling flaws in actual culinary performance, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«saubere und hygienische Arbeitsweise»
Highlighting a matter of course signals deficiencies in actual cooking performance, such as taste, creativity, or speed, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«setzte sich intensiv für die Belange der Mitarbeiterschaft ein»
Union activities or disruption of workplace peace were paramount (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«setzte sich stets intensiv für die Belange und Interessen seiner Untergebenen ein»
The employee sided with staff against management, demonstrating a lack of upward loyalty.
3.5«soweit es ihm möglich war»
The employee was clearly overwhelmed in stressful situations, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«war stets bemüht»
This is a notorious coded phrase meaning the employee tried hard but achieved no results (grade 3.5).
3.5«stets bemüht, den Anforderungen der Pflegepraxis gerecht zu werden»
The employee showed goodwill, but her actual performance fell short of requirements (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«stets bemüht, den Anforderungen gerecht zu werden»
The employee never met the job requirements at any point.
3.5«stets bemüht, die ihm aufgetragenen Arbeiten ordnungsgemäss auszuführen»
The employee tried, but the output was frequently faulty or incomplete, reflecting grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«stets bemüht, die ihm übertragenen Aufgaben zu unserer Zufriedenheit zu erledigen»
The employee tried hard but failed to deliver adequate results (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«stets bemüht, die ihr übertragenen Aufgaben nach besten Kräften zu erledigen»
Good intentions were present, but actual ability and results were insufficient (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«stets bemüht, die ihr übertragenen Aufgaben zu unserer Zufriedenheit zu erledigen»
The employee tried hard, but her actual performance was unsatisfactory.
3.5«stets bemüht, die internen administrativen Prozesse ordnungsgemäss abzuwickeln»
The employee spent too much time on paperwork instead of delivering actual sales results (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«stets bemüht, die vorgegebenen Gesprächszeiten einzuhalten»
He never managed to meet time targets and worked inefficiently, indicating an insufficient grade 3.5.
3.5«stets bereit, die zugewiesenen Arbeiten auszuführen»
She only did what she was ordered to do, demonstrating a lack of personal initiative (grade 3.5).
3.5«stets grossen Fleiss»
The employee made an effort, but was not necessarily successful or efficient.
3.5«stets hilfsbereit war und gerne andere unterstützte»
Signals that the employee was pleasant but underperforming, distracting themselves from their own duties by helping others (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«stets höflich»
She seemed distant, aloof, and lacking in empathy, which corresponds to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«stets pünktlich»
This implies that apart from punctuality, there were no noteworthy positive achievements to mention (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«stets pünktlich und äusserst zuverlässig bei der Einhaltung der Arbeitszeiten»
Emphasising basic self-evidences distracts from the fact that actual work performance was deficient (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«stets pünktlich und zuverlässig an seinem Arbeitsplatz»
The employee was physically present, but his actual work performance was insufficient, equating to a grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale.
3.5«stets um eine rasche Erledigung bemüht»
Signals that the employee tried to dispose of requests quickly without necessarily being successful or thorough (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«stets unfallfrei aus»
Highlights a self-evident requirement for a professional driver due to a lack of other accomplishments, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«unter Belastung versuchte er, die Ruhe zu bewahren»
He was completely unable to work under pressure and quickly lost his composure in stressful situations (grade 3.5).
3.5«vertrat die Interessen seines Teams mit Nachdruck»
This signals conflicts with senior management and a lack of upward loyalty, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«vertrat ihre Ansichten mit Nachdruck»
The employee was opinionated, arrogant, and showed a lack of ability to accept criticism, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«vertrat ihre Meinung im Team engagiert und mit Nachdruck»
She was argumentative, opinionated, and lacked teamwork skills.
3.5«vertrat seine Ansichten mit grossem Nachdruck»
He was opinionated, stubborn, difficult to advise, and showed a lack of willingness to compromise (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«vertrat unser Unternehmen mit grossem Enthusiasmus nach aussen»
The employee engaged in self-promotion at the expense of company interests, signaling grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«zeigte vollen Einsatz»
This indicates effort without actual success, corresponding to an unsatisfactory grade 3.5.
3.5«war bestrebt, die ihr uebertragenen Aufgaben zu unserer Zufriedenheit auszufuehren»
Signals that the employee tried, but ultimately failed to meet expectations (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«war pünktlich bei der Arbeit»
Highlighting self-evident basic requirements indicates a lack of other positive achievements.
3.5«war stets bemüht, den Anforderungen gerecht zu werden»
Indicates effort without success; the employee ultimately failed to meet requirements (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«war stets bemüht, neue Kunden zu gewinnen»
Swiss HR reads this as a total lack of sales success, indicating that the employee failed to close meaningful deals (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«war stets bestrebt, die Verkaufsziele zu erreichen»
The employee never achieved the sales targets (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«war stets pünktlich»
This phrase emphasizes a basic self-evidence, signaling grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«war stets pünktlich an ihrem Arbeitsplatz»
Highlighting self-evident expectations to conceal the lack of genuine performance traits, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«war stets um eine gute Pflege bemüht»
The employee made an effort, but her actual care performance was unsatisfactory, representing a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«wegen ihrer geselligen Art geschätzt»
Implies potential distraction through office gossip or alcohol issues (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«wegen seiner geselligen Art bei den Mitarbeitern sehr beliebt»
This phrase suggests a lack of professional boundaries, overly familiar behaviour, or potential excessive alcohol consumption during working hours (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«wegen seiner geselligen Art im Team ausserordentlich beliebt»
This phrase signals excessive alcohol consumption, a lack of work discipline, or too much personal distraction during working hours (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«wegen seiner geselligen Art im Team geschätzt»
He was inclined to excessive chatting during working hours or had an alcohol problem, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«wegen seiner geselligen Art im Team sehr geschätzt»
This indicates that the employee engaged in excessive chatting or personal socializing during working hours rather than focusing on work, corresponding to a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«Wegen seiner geselligen Art war er im Team und bei den Kollegen ausserordentlich beliebt»
This phrase signals a lack of assertiveness, overly informal behavior, or potentially excessive alcohol consumption during work events.
3.5«wir lernten ihn als kennen»
Signals that the stated trait was not consistently demonstrated in daily work, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«wir lernten sie als eine äusserst ehrliche und pünktliche Mitarbeiterin kennen»
Emphasising basic self-evidences implies that the employee was professionally useless (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«wir lernten sie als kennen»
Signals that the stated trait was not consistently displayed in daily practice, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«wir lernten sie als pflichtbewusste Mitarbeiterin kennen»
The phrasing implies the employer hoped she would be conscientious, but this was not confirmed in daily work (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«wünschen Frau Bieri viel Glück»
Implying that anyone needing luck was unsuccessful, signalling unsatisfactory performance (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«wünschen ihm viel Glück»
The employee was unsuccessful and desperately needs luck to succeed in the future, corresponding to a grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale.
3.5«wünschen ihm vor allem Gesundheit»
Indicating exceptionally high sick leave or lack of resilience, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«wünschen ihr alles Gute, auch bei der Suche nach einer neuen Herausforderung»
Indicates that the employee has no new job yet and was dismissed or forced to leave (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«wusste sich stets zu helfen»
The employee was unstructured or improvised, often at the expense of quality (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«zeigte ein gutes Einfühlungsvermögen im Umgang mit den Mitarbeitenden»
In an HR context, this phrase signals a lack of professional distance, indiscretion, or excessive chattiness.
3.5«zeigte für die anfallenden Arbeiten grosses Interesse»
The employee was interested in the work, but not necessarily competent or successful, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«zeigte grosses Interesse an ihrer Arbeit»
She was interested in the work but not necessarily competent or successful in execution, equating to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«zeigte grosses Interesse an neuen Technologien»
The employee was interested in new technologies but failed to master them or applied them unsuccessfully or overcomplicately, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«zeigte grosses Interesse an seiner Arbeit»
The employee was interested in the work but ultimately lacked competence or success (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«zeigte grosses Verständnis für die Anliegen»
The employee was friendly, but lacked professional or organizational control over tasks, signaling grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«zeigte reges Interesse an den Führungsaufgaben»
He was overwhelmed by the leadership role and achieved no real leadership success, marking an insufficient grade 3.5.
3.5«zeigte stets grosses Interesse an seiner Arbeit»
He was interested in the work, but was overwhelmed or unproductive in practice (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«zeigte stets grosses Verständnis für die Belange der Mitarbeitenden»
She was unable to assert herself, was overly lenient, and lacked leadership competence, indicating grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«zeigte volles Verständnis für die Anliegen»
The employee listened to client issues but failed to solve them successfully, representing a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«zeigte volles Verständnis für seine Arbeit»
Signals that the employee was sluggish, lazy, and produced virtually no productive output (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«zuverlässig und pünktlich»
Signals basic presence without initiative, meaning the employee merely worked strictly to rule (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«ausgeprägtes Einfühlungsvermögen für die Belange der Belegschaft»
The employee sought inappropriate personal contacts within the company or sided with staff against management, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«bemüht, die internen Vorgaben einzuhalten»
He tried to comply with internal rules but was unsuccessful, signifying grade 3.0 on the Swiss scale.
3.0«bemühte sich, die Arbeiten ordnungsgemäss auszuführen»
The employee was not equal to the demands of the role and produced flawed work, resulting in an unsatisfactory grade of 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«bemühte sich, die ihm übertragenen Arbeiten zu unserer Zufriedenheit auszuführen»
The work performance was insufficient (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale); the effort led to no usable result.
3.0«bemühte sich, die Zielvorgaben der Abteilung zu erreichen»
The targets were not achieved and the employee was unsuccessful, indicating grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«bemühte sich im Rahmen seiner Fähigkeiten»
The employee was completely incompetent and out of his depth in the role (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«bemühte sich im Rahmen seiner Möglichkeiten»
Performance was unsatisfactory; although the employee tried, they were not up to the technical or personal requirements (grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«bemühte sich stets, den Anforderungen ihrer Führungsrolle gerecht zu werden»
The employee was completely overwhelmed and unsuccessful as a manager, corresponding to grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«bemühte sich stets um Gründlichkeit»
Signals that the employee's work was ultimately not thorough, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«betonen, dass Herr Rossi die ihm anvertrauten Werkzeuge stets ordnungsgemäss behandelte»
Unusual emphasis on honesty or handling property raises suspicion of irregularities such as theft (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«danken ihm für seine Bemühungen»
There was no real workplace achievement, only an attempt (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«Das Arbeitsverhältnis wurde am [Datum] beendet»
Immediate dismissal or abrupt termination by the employer due to a severe incident.
3.0«durch ein dominantes Auftreten gekennzeichnet»
The employee managed authoritatively, possibly bullied subordinates, and created a poor working atmosphere (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«ein sehr pünktlicher und zuverlässiger Mitarbeiter»
The employee was present, but delivered no other noteworthy achievements.
3.0«entsprachen im Allgemeinen den Anforderungen»
Work performance was insufficient and exhibited significant deficiencies, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«entsprachen im Wesentlichen den Anforderungen»
The employee's performance was insufficient, corresponding to a grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«er betonte stets seine Ehrlichkeit»
This implies the employee was dishonest or under reasonable suspicion of theft or embezzlement in the warehouse, corresponding to a grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«gegenseitigen Einvernehmen»
The departure was a covert termination initiated by the employer (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«ging mit grossem Fleiss an seine Aufgaben heran»
This implies the employee worked hard but failed to achieve useful results, corresponding to grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«ging mit grossem Fleiss und regem Interesse an seine Aufgaben heran»
The employee tried hard but was unsuccessful, lacking any confirmation of actual success (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«im Allgemeinen ordnungsgemäss»
Performance was faulty and failed to meet minimum requirements, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«im Allgemeinen zu unserer Zufriedenheit»
Performance was insufficient and failed to meet expectations.
3.0«im gegenseitigen Einvernehmen»
The employee was dismissed or urged to sign a termination agreement, representing grade 3.0.
3.0«im gegenseitigen Einvernehmen aufgelöst»
The employee was strongly encouraged to leave, resulting in a de facto dismissal.
3.0«im gegenseitigen Einvernehmen gelöst»
The employee was dismissed or urged to sign a separation agreement.
3.0«im Rahmen ihrer Möglichkeiten»
Signals that the employee was out of her depth and that her capacity was severely limited (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«erledigte Aufgaben im Rahmen seiner Fähigkeiten»
This is a severe warning signal indicating inadequate capabilities (grade 3.0).
3.0«im Rahmen seiner Fähigkeiten bemühte»
This indicates that the employee's abilities were severely deficient and that they were completely out of their depth (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«im Rahmen seiner Möglichkeiten»
Total overwhelm; the employee's capabilities were completely insufficient for the role (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«insbesondere auch Gesundheit»
An indirect reference to health issues, often linked to substance abuse or high absenteeism (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«insbesondere eine stabile Gesundheit»
This phrase serves as a coded signal indicating high rates of absence due to illness, corresponding to a grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«koordinierte die Aufgaben in seiner Abteilung mit grossem Eifer»
The employee was active but completely unstructured and ultimately unsuccessful (grade 3.5 or lower on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«mit Eifer an seine Aufgaben heran»
Headless activity without tangible or measurable results, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«mit grossem Eifer»
This indicates that while the employee was active, their work was unstructured and unsuccessful (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«mit grossem Eifer bei der Sache»
The employee made an effort but was unsuccessful, demonstrating headless actionism (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«mit grossem Fleiss»
She worked hard or stayed busy, but failed to produce any useful results, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«mit grossem Fleiss und grossem Interesse»
Signals that the employee was busy and interested, but failed to achieve usable results (grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«mit grossem Pflichtbewusstsein»
This means the employee did only the bare minimum and showed no personal initiative, corresponding to grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«nach Ablauf der Probezeitverlängerung im gegenseitigen Einverständnis»
Performance was so poor that the probation period had to be extended, ultimately leading to termination, equating to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«nach besten Kräften»
The employee made an effort, but the results were insufficient (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«nach unseren Anweisungen»
This indicates that she showed no initiative at all and strictly worked only to order, corresponding to a grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«ohne Tadel»
This implies the employee was unremarkable, lacking positive commitment or outstanding cooperation, corresponding to grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«Pünktlichkeit und Zuverlässigkeit im Einhalten der Arbeitszeiten waren eine grosse Stütze»
There were no positive achievements to report, so basic physical attendance is overemphasized, reflecting grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«sehr geselliger Mitarbeiter»
He distracted others from work or consumed alcohol during working hours, earning a grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«setzte sich engagiert fuer die Interessen der Arbeitnehmer ein»
Signals distraction due to union activities or internal troublemaking rather than working (grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«stets bemüht, den ihm übertragenen Aufgaben gerecht zu werden»
The employee tried hard, but was completely overwhelmed and unsuccessful (grade 3.0).
3.0«stets bemüht, die ihm übertragenen Arbeiten ordnungsgemäss auszuführen»
The employee performed tasks defectively and failed to meet basic job requirements (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«stets bemüht, die Kundenbeziehungen zu pflegen»
The employee was unsuccessful in client interactions and failed to close sales.
3.0«stets bemüht, die Terminvorgaben einzuhalten»
She regularly failed to meet deadlines, representing a poor rating of grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«stets bemüht, die vereinbarten Verkaufsziele zu erreichen»
Unsuccessful in sales as targets were consistently missed, representing grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«stets pünktlich und pflichtbewusst»
The employee strictly worked to rule and showed no initiative or willingness to perform (grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«stets pünktliche Mitarbeiterin»
This phrase signals that the employee excelled at showing up on time, but produced no usable work output (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«stets um ein gutes Verhältnis zu den Patienten bemüht»
This indicates that the employee had difficulty dealing with patients and that his efforts were unsuccessful (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«stets um eine saubere Betriebsführung bemüht»
The operations were disorganized and messy, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«stets volles Verständnis für die Belange seiner Mitarbeitenden»
The manager was weak in leadership, failed to assert himself, and granted staff too much leeway.
3.0«suchte er stets mit grösster Sorgfalt zu erledigen»
The employee tried but failed, suggesting significant shortcomings or disorder, reflecting grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«trat engagiert für die Belange seiner Mitarbeiter ein»
The employee sided with the team against executive management and acted as an instigator, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«trat stets sehr selbstbewusst auf»
The employee acted in an arrogant and domineering manner, overemphasised his own abilities, and was poorly integrated, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«verlässt uns heute»
A summary dismissal or very abrupt separation is implied by the absence of standard termination formulas (grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«vertrat seine Meinung im Führungskreis stets mit Nachdruck»
The employee was extremely stubborn, opinionated, and lacked teamwork skills at management level (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«viel Erfolg bei der Suche nach einer neuen Herausforderung»
The employee was dismissed because he was unsuitable for the position, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«vor allem Gesundheit»
The employee had an excessive amount of sick leave, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«was wir zur Kenntnis nehmen»
A cold, almost hostile formulation indicating relief at the employee's departure (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«wegen seiner geselligen Art bei den Mitarbeitern sehr geschätzt»
The employee prioritized social chatting or partying over work and lacked authority, equating to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«wegen seiner geselligen und kontaktfreudigen Art»
The employee was a passenger who spent more time talking and drinking coffee than working, with potential drinking problems.
3.0«wünschen ihm alles Gute bei der Arbeitssuche»
The employee was dismissed and is currently unemployed, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«wünschen ihm für die Zukunft viel Erfolg»
Swiss HR reads the phrase 'every success' to imply that the employee had no success at the current company (grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«wünschen ihm für seinen weiteren Weg viel Glück»
The employer attests no professional success, implying the employee will need luck to find another job (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«zeigte ein ausgeprägtes Selbstbewusstsein»
This signals that she behaved arrogantly, was difficult to manage, or was incapable of accepting criticism, corresponding to a grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«zeigte für seine Arbeit stets grosses Verständnis»
The employee was lazy and achieved no actual work results, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«zeigte reges Interesse»
The employee was interested in the work, but failed to deliver any productive contributions.
3.0«zeigte stets grosses Verständnis für seine Arbeit»
The employee was lazy or produced no meaningful output, displaying only theoretical interest (grade 3.0 on the Swiss scale).
3.0«zeigte Verständnis für die Bedürfnisse»
The employee had understanding, but failed to translate it into adequate care performance.
3.0«zeigte volles Verständnis für seine Aufgaben»
The employee understood the work theoretically but was unproductive or lazy in practice (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«bei der Suche nach einer Stelle, die seinen Fähigkeiten besser entspricht»
The employee was completely unsuited for the role performed.
2.0«bemühte sich»
This phrase signals complete failure on the job with no measurable success whatsoever (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«bemühte sich, den ihm übertragenen Aufgaben gerecht zu werden»
The employee was completely overwhelmed and failed to accomplish the tasks, resulting in grade 2.0.
2.0«bemühte sich, die ihm übertragenen Arbeiten zu erledigen»
Complete failure; the employee did not successfully accomplish his tasks (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«bemühte sich stets»
The employee completely failed to meet requirements, representing total failure despite making an effort (grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«Beschäftigung, die seinen Neigungen entspricht»
Swiss HR reads this phrase to mean that the employee was completely unsuitable for the profession (grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«bewies grosses Verständnis für seine Arbeit»
This signals that the employee understood the job in theory but delivered no practical output or results (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«Das Arbeitsverhaeltnis wurde fristlos beendet»
Indicates a severe cause that rendered continuing the employment relationship unviable (grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«das nötige Quäntchen Erfolg»
The employee was completely unsuccessful and incompetent in the position (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«durch seine gesellige Art trug er massgeblich zur Auflockerung des Arbeitsklimas bei»
This signals that the employee did not take work seriously, chatted too much, and possibly had alcohol issues (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«ein hohes Mass an Fleiss»
The employee was kept busy but failed to deliver usable results, corresponding to grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«erledigte die ihm übertragenen Aufgaben im Allgemeinen zu unserer Zufriedenheit»
The employee's performance was overall unsatisfactory and unusable, representing a grade 2.0 on the Swiss scale.
2.0«frei von Beanstandungen»
Barely tolerable performance, far removed from good collaboration (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«geselligen und umgänglichen Mitarbeiter»
This points to excessive alcohol consumption during working hours or talkativeness that hindered work.
2.0«im gegenseitigen Einvernehmen beendet»
The employee was dismissed or signed a termination agreement to settle an impending firing.
2.0«im Rahmen ihrer Fähigkeiten»
She was completely overwhelmed by her tasks and lacked the necessary qualifications, corresponding to grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«im Rahmen seiner Fähigkeiten»
He was technically not up to the demands of the job, representing grade 2.0 on the Swiss scale.
2.0«insbesondere die nötige Gelassenheit»
The employee was extremely hot-tempered, arrogant, choleric, or inflexible.
2.0«insbesondere viel Erfolg»
This is a coded indication that the employee was entirely unsuccessful during their employment (grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«mit Unterstützung der Abteilung»
This phrase indicates that the employee was unable to work independently and required colleagues to complete their work (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«nach bestem Wissen»
This indicates that the employee lacked subject knowledge and made many mistakes, corresponding to grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«nach seinen Vorstellungen zu führen»
This phrase signals that the employee was not a team player, ignored guidelines, and stubbornly insisted on doing things his own way (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«sehr anpassungsfähiger Mitarbeiter»
This implies that the employee was a mere follower without their own opinion or initiative (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«seine Meinung stets offen vertrat»
The employee was rebellious, argumentative, uncooperative, and lacked teamwork skills, corresponding to grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«setzte sich im Rahmen seiner Fähigkeiten ein»
He was completely unequal to the requirements and totally overwhelmed, representing a grade 2.0 on the Swiss scale.
2.0«setzte sich im Rahmen seiner Möglichkeiten ein»
His capabilities were severely limited and he was completely unsuited for the position, signaling grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«stets bemüht, die Arbeitszeiten einzuhalten»
The employee frequently arrived late or was unpunctual, corresponding to grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«stets bestrebt»
He tried but failed to deliver results, which is completely insufficient (grade 2.0).
2.0«stets mit grossem Fleiss und grosser Pünktlichkeit anging»
The employee was present and industrious, but failed to achieve any meaningful output, resulting in a poor grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«stets pünktlich an seinem Arbeitsplatz anzutreffen»
Punctuality was his only trait; he accomplished nothing during working hours (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«stets pünktlich und hielt die Arbeitszeiten ein»
A distraction criterion indicating that apart from punctuality, there were no positive achievements to report (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«stets pünktlich und hielt die Arbeitszeiten genau ein»
She accomplished no noteworthy achievements other than being on time, equating to grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«stets pünktlich und ordentlich»
Swiss HR interprets this as an emphasis on self-evident, basic requirements because there were no real achievements to report (grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«Suche nach einer Beschäftigung, die seinen Neigungen besser entspricht»
The employee was completely unsuitable for the role performed.
2.0«tat sein Bestes»
The employee tried but failed completely, corresponding to grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«trat engagiert für die Interessen der Arbeitnehmer ein»
The employee was a workplace troublemaker, sought conflict with management, or was inappropriately active in union matters (grade 2.0).
2.0«trat engagiert für die Interessen der Mitarbeiter ein»
The employee was a troublemaker who opposed management or engaged in disruptive union activity (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«trat für die Interessen der Mitarbeiter stets engagiert ein»
This phrase signals a contentious individual who disrupted workplace peace or displayed disloyalty towards management.
2.0«um Ordnung an seinem Arbeitsplatz bemüht»
The employee was pedantic and lost himself in trivialities instead of working productively, corresponding to grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«verlässt uns per heute»
This signals an immediate termination for cause or instant release from duty ('Freistellung'), corresponding to grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«vertrat engagiert seine eigene Meinung»
The employee was argumentative, opinionated, uncooperative and unwilling to compromise, corresponding to grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«vertrat in den Besprechungen mit Nachdruck seine eigene Meinung»
The employee was stubborn, uncooperative, argumentative and lacked teamwork skills (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«vertrat seine eigene Meinung im Team stets mit Nachdruck»
The employee was arrogant, uncooperative, opinionated and lacked teamwork skills, corresponding to grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«vor allem viel Erfolg»
The employee had no success at our company, and we hope they find it somewhere else.
2.0«war stets bestrebt, die Vorgaben einzuhalten»
This indicates that he regularly failed to achieve project goals and specifications, corresponding to a grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«wegen seiner geselligen Art»
The employee showed a tendency toward excessive alcohol consumption or inappropriate familiarity, corresponding to grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«wegen seiner geselligen Natur geschätzt»
Suspected alcohol problems or inappropriate familiarity in the workplace.
2.0«wünschen ihm viel Erfolg bei der Suche nach einer Beschaeftigung, die seinen Faehigkeiten entspricht»
A clear indicator of complete incompetence and being entirely unsuited to the role (grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«zeigte fuer die ihm uebertragenen Aufgaben volles Verstaendnis»
Signals that the employee understood the tasks in theory but was practically incapable of performing them (grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«zeigte grosses Interesse»
This signals that the employee was willing but completely incompetent and achieved nothing (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«zeigte grosses Interesse an den Kassenablaeufen und bewies viel Sinn fuer die finanziellen Belange»
Raises suspicion of financial irregularities, theft, embezzlement, or unauthorized handling of funds (grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«zeigte grosses Verständnis für seine Arbeit»
The employee was lazy, did not perform the work personally, or delegated tasks impermissibly.
2.0«zeigte grosses Verständnis für seine Aufgaben»
The employee did not perform work himself, leaving it to others or simply lacking capability (grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«zeigte stets grosses Interesse»
The employee tried hard, but was completely unsuccessful and incapable.
2.0«zeigte stets grosses Verständnis für seine Aufgaben»
The employee had theoretical understanding, but practically delivered no noteworthy performance, which corresponds to grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«zeigte stets volles Verständnis für seine Arbeit»
The employee was lazy and delivered no noteworthy performance himself, corresponding to grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«zeigte stets volles Verständnis für seine Aufgaben»
The employee was completely overwhelmed and failed to grasp or manage his duties (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«Zusammenarbeit mit ihm wurde am [Datum] beendet»
Immediate dismissal or termination by the employer due to severe misconduct.
2.0
Conduct towards superiors, colleagues & clients
Behaviour statements. The order and the people mentioned (or left out) carry meaning.
«ausnahmslos vorbildlich»
The employee demonstrated exemplary conduct towards all hierarchical levels.
6.0«jederzeit vorbildlich»
An outstanding evaluation of conduct towards all hierarchical levels, corresponding to grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«jederzeit vorbildlich und loyal»
Outstanding conduct towards all hierarchical levels, corresponding to grade 6.0 on the Swiss scale.
6.0«stets vorbildlich»
This indicates outstanding conduct towards all hierarchical levels, corresponding to a top grade of 6.0 on the Swiss scale.
6.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten, Kollegen und Kunden war stets vorbildlich»
Flawless social conduct listed in the correct hierarchical order (grade 6 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
6.0«Verhalten war stets einwandfrei»
Good, conflict-free social conduct (grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«gegenüber den Kollegen jederzeit vorbildlich»
Swiss HR understands that by omitting superiors, the relationship with management was not free of tension (grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«gegenüber Kollegen und Kunden war jederzeit vorbildlich»
The deliberate omission of superiors in an otherwise detailed conduct clause indicates severe conflicts with management, corresponding to grade 5.0 overall but with a hidden negative signal.
5.0«Ihr Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war jederzeit vorbildlich und loyal»
Very good, faultless social conduct, corresponding to grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
5.0«Ihr Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war stets vorbildlich»
Internal conduct was very good, but omitting clients/partners in a client-facing agency role implies external relationship problems (grade 5.0).
5.0«jederzeit absolut vorbildlich»
Very good conduct towards all groups of people (superiors, colleagues, clients).
5.0«jederzeit absolut vorbildlich und loyal»
The employee demonstrated very good, faultless conduct towards all hierarchical levels, corresponding to a strong rating (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«stets absolut vorbildlich, loyal und von hoher Professionalität geprägt»
This confirms flawless interpersonal conduct towards all demanding stakeholders, evaluating to grade 5.0.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Arbeitskollegen und externen Partnern war stets vorbildlich»
The deliberate omission of superiors signals a strained relationship with management, corresponding to grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Mitarbeitenden, Kollegen sowie externen Partnern war jederzeit vorbildlich»
The deliberate omission of superiors signals that the relationship with management was severely disrupted, which is unacceptable in HR roles.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber der Geschäftsleitung war jederzeit vorbildlich»
This shows a good relationship with superiors, but omitting conduct toward subordinates signals an authoritarian or poor leadership style.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen und externen Partnern war jederzeit vorbildlich»
Omitting conduct towards superiors indicates significant issues with hierarchy or insubordination.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen und Kunden war vorbildlich»
Deliberately omitting superiors points to a severely disturbed relationship with authority figures, evaluating to grade 5.0 overall.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen und unseren externen Agenturpartnern war stets vorbildlich»
The deliberate omission of superiors indicates a strained or rebellious relationship with management, corresponding to grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen war kollegial»
The omission of superiors points to authority issues, while 'collegial' is weaker than 'exemplary' (grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten, Kollegen, Mitarbeitenden und Kunden war jederzeit absolut vorbildlich»
Flawless social conduct across all levels including exemplary leadership skills, representing grade 5.0 on the Swiss scale.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten, Kollegen und Agenturpartnern ist jederzeit vorbildlich»
The employee demonstrated flawless internal and external social behavior, corresponding to grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
5.0«Verhalten gegenueber Vorgesetzten, Kollegen und externen Partnern war jederzeit absolut vorbildlich»
Reflects outstanding social conduct across all hierarchical levels including external partners (grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten, Kollegen und Kunden war jederzeit vorbildlich»
Flawless social behaviour across all hierarchical levels and towards external clients (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten, Kollegen und Kunden war jederzeit vorbildlich und loyal»
Flawless social conduct across all hierarchical levels, corresponding to grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten sowie gegenüber unseren externen Partnern stets vorbildlich»
Omitting colleagues downgrades an otherwise good assessment to a grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale due to team issues.
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war jederzeit vorbildlich»
The employee displayed good internal social behavior, but omitting clients in a sales role hints at dissatisfied customers (grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war stets vorbildlich»
Impeccable social behaviour across all hierarchical levels (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war vorbildlich»
Internal conduct was flawless, but total silence regarding clients in a client-facing role reveals severe shortcomings in client relations (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Mitarbeitern war stets vorbildlich»
Internal conduct was good, but the phrase deliberately excludes conduct towards external stakeholders through eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen').
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten war jederzeit vorbildlich»
Swiss HR notes good upward conduct, but the deliberate omission of colleagues suggests significant team conflicts or unpopularity among peers (grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten war stets vorbildlich»
The eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') regarding colleagues points to serious conflicts or a lack of teamwork skills (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Verhalten von Frau Fischer gegenüber den Arbeitskollegen und externen Partnern war jederzeit vorbildlich»
Superiors are intentionally left out of the conduct evaluation, signalling authority issues or conflicts with managers (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«einwandfrei»
Good, expectation-meeting and conflict-free behaviour, equating to grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«Ihr Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kunden war stets einwandfrei»
Good but not outstanding conduct, with the omission of colleagues indicating minor team tensions.
4.5«im Wesentlichen einwandfrei»
There were significant social conflicts or misconduct within the team (grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.5«immer einwandfrei»
This signals good, uncomplicated behavior without fault, corresponding to grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«jederzeit einwandfrei»
The employee exhibited good and correct behaviour across all hierarchy levels.
4.5«stets einwandfrei»
Good conduct evaluation (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale, corresponding to an overall grade of around 4.5).
4.5«stets einwandfrei und korrekt»
The employee exhibited good, unexceptionable conduct, corresponding to a grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«trat gegenüber Kollegen stets sehr selbstbewusst auf und vertrat ihre eigene Meinung mit Nachdruck»
She was argumentative, arrogant, or lacked teamwork skills, causing social conflict in the team (grade 4.5).
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber den Bewohnern und den Arbeitskollegen war stets einwandfrei»
The intentional omission of superiors signals a strained relationship with management, corresponding to grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber den Kollegen und Kunden war stets einwandfrei»
This represents eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') regarding superiors, pointing to authority issues or conflicts with management.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber den Mitarbeitenden und externen Partnern war jederzeit einwandfrei»
The complete omission of superiors points to significant tension or conflicts with management, corresponding to grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber den Mitarbeitenden war stets einwandfrei»
Behavior towards superiors is completely omitted, pointing to significant conflicts with management.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber den Patienten und deren Angehörigen sowie im Team war stets einwandfrei»
The employee was popular with patients and colleagues, but the deliberate omission of superiors signals conflict with management (grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen und Kunden war einwandfrei»
For a manager, omitting superiors and subordinate employees signals severe deficiencies in leadership and acceptance of hierarchy (grade 4.5).
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen und Kunden war stets einwandfrei»
By deliberately omitting superiors, eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') signals serious, unresolved conflict with management, significantly lowering the overall evaluation (grade 4.5).
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen und Vorgesetzten war einwandfrei»
Good internal social conduct, but deliberately excludes external parties like clients or relatives, reflecting grade 4.5.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen und Vorgesetzten war stets einwandfrei»
Correct social conduct, though listing colleagues before superiors hints at slight distance towards management (grade 4.5).
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen war stets einwandfrei»
Behavior towards superiors is deliberately omitted, signaling issues with authority and hierarchy.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Kunden und Vorgesetzten war jederzeit einwandfrei»
Conduct was overall very good, but omitting colleagues implies minor friction, resulting in a slight devaluation to grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Kunden und Vorgesetzten war stets einwandfrei»
This displays eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') regarding peers, suggesting an overly self-interested worker who was unpopular in the team.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten, Kollegen und externen Partnern war stets einwandfrei»
This indicates good social conduct overall, but deliberately omits behavior towards subordinates in a leadership role (grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Arbeitskollegen war stets einwandfrei»
By intentionally omitting clients from the behavior statement, Swiss HR reads eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating client relationship issues and a grade 4.5.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und den behandelnden Ärzten war jederzeit einwandfrei»
The deliberate omission of colleagues constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating potential team conflicts or a lack of teamwork skills.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war einwandfrei»
Good, uncomplicated social conduct within the internal team (grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.5«Verhalten gegenueber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war jederzeit einwandfrei»
Signals good, straightforward social conduct where the correct hierarchy (superiors before colleagues) is respected (grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war stets einwandfrei»
This signals good internal conduct, but omitting external contacts suggests potential issues in dealing with clients or customers, corresponding to a grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kunden war jederzeit einwandfrei»
The deliberate omission of colleagues indicates that the employee was a lone wolf or caused significant team conflicts.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Mitarbeitern war stets einwandfrei»
Client conduct was deliberately omitted, pointing to problems in client relations through eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), yielding grade 4.5 on the Swiss scale.
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und unseren externen Partnern war jederzeit einwandfrei»
Good conduct towards bosses and external contacts, but omitting colleagues signals clear problems within the team (grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.5«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten war jederzeit einwandfrei»
Omitting conduct towards subordinates indicates an authoritarian or unpopular leadership style, yielding a grade 4.5.
4.5«Verhalten war einwandfrei»
This indicates good, correct conduct, but without notable initiative or warmth, corresponding to grade 4.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.5«Das Verhalten gegenüber den Mitarbeitenden und externen Partnern war stets korrekt»
Behaviour towards superiors was insufficient or marked by severe conflict, as superiors were excluded from the conduct statement (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Das Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen war korrekt»
Behaviour towards superiors was deficient or marked by conflict, as this hierarchical level was deliberately omitted (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Das Verhalten von Frau Keller gegenüber Kollegen und Kunden war stets korrekt und freundlich»
By deliberately omitting superiors, the reference signals significant behavioral issues towards bosses through eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), earning a grade 4.0.
4.0«gegenüber den Vorgesetzten trat er stets loyal und korrekt auf»
While conduct was technically correct, it indicates a lack of genuine willingness to cooperate or a distant relationship, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«grosses Einfühlungsvermögen im Umgang mit der Kundschaft»
The employee was too soft in sales or negotiations, failed to assert herself, or tended to make excessive concessions.
4.0«Ihr Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kunden war stets korrekt»
The deliberate omission of colleagues signals that team behaviour was unsatisfactory, which Swiss HR reads as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') and equates to grade 4.0.
4.0«im Grossen und Ganzen korrekt»
Conduct was borderline, with repeated conflicts or instances of impoliteness.
4.0«Im Kollegenkreis galt er als geselliger Mitarbeiter»
The employee tended to chat excessively or possibly had alcohol issues, prioritizing sociability over work (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«im Rahmen der Vorgaben stets korrekt»
Conduct was distant, uncooperative, and barely acceptable, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«im Wesentlichen korrekt»
The employee's behavior towards superiors left a lot to be desired and he struggled with workplace hierarchy (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«in der Regel korrekt»
There were repeated incidents or rude behaviour towards residents or stakeholders, yielding grade 4.0.
4.0«insgesamt korrekt»
Swiss HR interprets this as a sign that the employee's behavior toward superiors was borderline and left much to be desired (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Verhalten war korrekt»
Distant but just acceptable behaviour (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«meist korrekt»
Conduct was frequently incorrect and gave cause for complaints, corresponding to grade 4.0.
4.0«stets bemüht, den Kunden und Gästen unseres Hauses freundlich zu begegnen»
The employee was actually unfriendly, arrogant, or rude to customers.
4.0«stets für die Belange des Teams einsetzte»
She was inclined towards union activity or sided unilaterally with colleagues against the company in conflicts, equating to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Arbeitskollegen war stets korrekt»
Eloquent silence regarding superiors indicates significant tension or conflicts with management, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Kollegen war korrekt»
The employee had a distant, cool relationship with team members, while superiors were intentionally omitted (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Kollegen war stets korrekt»
Omitting superiors signals severe issues in conduct toward management, indicating grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Kunden war stets freundlich Auch im Kollegenkreis»
The deliberate omission of superiors indicates authority issues or conflicts with management.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Patienten und Kollegen war stets korrekt»
The employee was distant and unapproachable, while the deliberate omission of superiors signals insubordination (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Patienten war stets korrekt»
Describing behavior as 'correct' signals a grade 3-4, indicating a lack of empathy and genuine care towards patients.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Vorgesetzten war jederzeit korrekt»
Eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'): The deliberate omission of colleagues and clients indicates significant problems with peers and customers, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Vorgesetzten war korrekt»
This signals that behavior towards managers was distant and not free from tension, corresponding to grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen und Kunden war korrekt»
Eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') regarding superiors, with 'correct' acting as a minimal formula for distant behavior (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen war korrekt»
This indicates the employee was an outsider and deliberately omits any assessment of behaviour towards superiors, corresponding to a grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen war stets korrekt»
Behavior towards superiors is deliberately omitted, signaling tension with management and a grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Kunden war stets korrekt»
This means behaviour was not directly damaging to business, but was impersonal, inflexible, and lacked genuine customer orientation, equivalent to a grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Patienten war stets korrekt»
Correct conduct represents the absolute bare minimum, lacking empathy, warmth, or appropriate care (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war korrekt»
This signals a distant working relationship without positive social behavior, corresponding to grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war loyal»
The employee adapted to the environment but showed no special initiative or genuine teamwork.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Kollegen war stets korrekt»
Conduct was adequate but suggests a lack of warmth or distance, while completely omitting clients (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten war jederzeit loyal und korrekt»
Eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') regarding peers signals an inability to work in a team or severe team conflicts, equal to grade 4.0.
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten war korrekt»
The relationship with superiors was distant and cool, which is the opposite of loyal or exemplary (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten war stets korrekt»
Signals very distant interaction without active cooperation, while omitting colleagues reinforces suspicion of isolation (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«war ein korrekter Mitarbeiter»
The phrase indicates cold, distant behavior and a lack of integration into the team, corresponding to grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«war immer um ein gutes Arbeitsklima besorgt»
Swiss HR understands this phrase to mean that the employee disrupted the workplace atmosphere through gossip, intrigue, or inappropriate behaviour (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«Bei den Mitarbeitern und Kollegen war sie wegen ihrer toleranten und umgaenglichen Art sehr geschaetzt»
Deliberately omitting superiors while emphasizing popularity with peers indicates a lack of loyalty to management (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«bei den Patientinnen und Patienten sowie den Kolleginnen war sie wegen ihrer freundlichen Art sehr beliebt»
The deliberate omission of superiors demonstrates significant behavioral issues toward management, acting as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') at grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«war bei den Mitarbeitenden sehr beliebt»
A subtle hint at conflicts with management (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«beriet die Kundschaft auf seine ganz eigene, unverwechselbare Art»
The employee was impolite to customers or behaved in an arrogant and idiosyncratic manner (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«durch seine gesellige Art im Team beliebt»
The employee was overly talkative, distracted colleagues, or had work ethic issues, sometimes serving as a code for alcohol problems (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«gab zu keinen Klagen Anlass»
Behavior was barely tolerable, but far from good; pure damage control.
3.5«gab zu keinerlei Klagen Anlass»
The employee met minimum standards, but this is not a positive evaluation of behaviour (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«gegenüber den Arbeitskollegen war stets tadellos»
Swiss HR notes the missing mention of superiors, which points to underlying issues with authority (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«geselliger Kollege, der die Kaffeepausen bereicherte»
Distraction through private conversations or idle gossip at the expense of working time, reflecting grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«grosses Verständnis für die Belange unserer Kunden»
He was unable to close deals, yielded too easily to customer demands, and thereby damaged company margins, equating to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen und Vorgesetzten»
The reversed hierarchy points to issues with authority (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«kollegiales Verhältnis zu ihren Mitarbeitern»
She focused on maintaining private contacts rather than concentrating on work, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«loyal und setzte sich stark für die Anliegen der Mitarbeiter ein»
Conflict of interest where the employee sided with staff against company management, reflecting grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«sich im Kreise der Kollegen gut zu behaupten»
This indicates poor teamwork, selfish behavior, and an aggressive attitude, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«stets bestimmt auftrat»
The employee acted in an impolite, arrogant, or aggressive manner towards clients.
3.5«sein freundliches Wesen»
Points to a lack of professional competence or assertiveness (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«stets kameradschaftlich»
The employee was more interested in chatting with colleagues than doing productive work, amounting to grade 3.5.
3.5«stets um ein gutes Einvernehmen mit den Kolleginnen und Kollegen bemüht»
This indicates that the employee had significant difficulties within the team and was unpopular, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«trat sie stets äusserst selbstbewusst auf»
A code for arrogant, opinionated, or aggressive behaviour towards clients, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«trat Vorgesetzten gegenüber stets sehr selbstbewusst auf»
This points to arrogance, lack of respect, or insubordination towards management, reflecting grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«Verhalten gegenüber den Kollegen war stets kameradschaftlich»
Eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') regarding superiors points to authority issues, representing grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«Verhalten gegenueber den Patienten und Kollegen war stets kollegial»
Omitting superiors signals a conflict with management through eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen war stets kameradschaftlich»
The employee was friendly with peers but tended to spend too much time socializing and disrupted workplace harmony (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«verstand es, sich durchzusetzen»
An indication of an egotistical or uncompromising character (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«vertrat seine Ansichten im Team stets mit Nachdruck»
This signals conflict-prone behavior, stubbornness, and an inability to compromise, equating to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«von kollegialer Offenheit geprägt»
The employee possibly leaked confidential HR information among colleagues; lack of professional distance.
3.5«wegen ihrer geselligen Art bei den Kollegen sehr geschätzt»
The employee chatted too much during working hours, distracted others, or exhibited problematic behavior such as alcohol issues (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«wegen ihrer geselligen Art im Team geschätzt»
This implies an excessive focus on personal socializing at work or distracting colleagues.
3.5«wegen seiner geselligen Art im Kollegenkreis beliebt»
Implying excessive alcohol consumption, chattiness, or a lack of professional boundaries, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«zeigte für die Belange der Kunden Verständnis»
He was impolite, failed to solve customer problems, or engaged in useless arguments, marking an insufficient performance (grade 3.5).
3.5«bemühte sich stets um einen freundlichen Umgang mit der Kundschaft»
The employee was unfriendly, impatient and unsuitable for customer contact (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«bemühte sich um eine freundliche Betreuung der Kunden»
The employee was awkward, unfriendly, or incompetent when dealing with customers, signaling grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«durch seine gesellige Art war er im Kollegenkreis sehr beliebt»
Hints at inappropriate workplace behaviour, potential alcohol issues, or excessive socializing during work hours (grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«ein geselliger Mitarbeiter»
Swiss HR interprets this as a sign of excessive talking, distracting colleagues, or possible alcohol issues at the workplace (grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«war sehr gesellig»
Coded language for alcohol problems or excessive gossiping (grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«gesellige Art zur Belebung der Teamatmosphäre»
This phrase is a coded hint at alcohol issues or unprofessional, inappropriate behavior within the team, reflecting grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«grosses Verhandlungsgeschick»
Swiss HR translates this phrase to mean the employee was unyielding, pushy, or even arrogant with clients (grade 3 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«sehr geselligen Mitarbeiter»
Signals alcohol problems during working hours or excessive distraction of colleagues from their work.
3.0«setzte sich aktiv für die Interessen der Kollegen ein»
He acted as a troublemaker in the company and sought confrontation with management, equating to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«trat engagiert für die Interessen der Kollegen ein»
This signals a troublemaker, aggressive employee representative, or argumentative individual who disrupted workplace harmony (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«trug massgeblich zur Belebung des Arbeitsklimas bei»
The employee gossiped a lot, distracted colleagues from their work, or was intrusive.
3.0«verfügte über eine eigene Meinung»
The employee was uncooperative and refused to accept instructions from superiors, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«Verhalten gegenüber den Arbeitskollegen war stets kameradschaftlich»
This constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') regarding clients and superiors, signaling unprofessional behavior in client contacts.
3.0«war stets um ein gutes Verhältnis zu den Kollegen besorgt»
The employee exhibited difficult social behavior, sought acceptance, but was unpopular or created tension in the team, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«wegen seiner geselligen Art bei Kollegen geschätzt»
A coded reference to excessive alcohol consumption or excessive personal distractions during working hours (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«wegen seiner geselligen Art im Kollegenkreis sehr beliebt»
Hints at excessive alcohol consumption or overly informal, unprofessional workplace behaviour (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«wegen seiner geselligen Art im Kollegenkreis sehr geschätzt»
Points to inappropriate conduct, possibly excessive alcohol consumption or excessive distraction through personal contacts during work hours.
3.0«wegen seiner geselligen Art im Team sehr beliebt»
An indication of excessive alcohol consumption or inappropriate distraction of colleagues during working hours (grade 3.0).
3.0«Wegen seiner geselligen Art war er im Kollegenkreis sehr geschätzt»
This phrase hints at inappropriate workplace behavior, potential alcohol issues, or excessive socializing during work hours (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«Wegen seiner geselligen Art war er im Team sehr beliebt»
The employee tended to chatter excessively, distract colleagues, or potentially had alcohol issues.
3.0«zeigte die nötige Anpassungsfähigkeit»
The employee was a sycophant towards superiors who bowed to management but treated subordinates poorly (grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.0«bemühte sich um ein angemessenes Auftreten gegenüber unseren Kunden»
The employee acted unprofessionally and annoyed customers (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«im Grossen und Ganzen verträglich»
This indicates difficult social behavior, revealing that the employee was a troublemaker who struggled to fit into the team (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«suchte stets das Einvernehmen mit den Vorgesetzten»
The employee was conflict-averse and unable to assert himself, or conversely, submissive and overly needy of harmony.
2.0«trat im Allgemeinen höflich auf»
The employee's daily conduct was impolite, arrogant, or unprofessional, resulting in grade 2.0.
2.0«Verhalten gegenüber Kollegen war von Toleranz geprägt»
The employee was an outsider and experienced severe difficulties working in a team (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0«wegen seiner geselligen Art sehr geschätzt»
Suspicion of inappropriate behaviour, such as drinking problems or over-familiarity instead of leadership, reflecting grade 2.0.
2.0
Closing statements
Thanks, regret and good wishes at the end of the letter – or their absence.
«bedauern diesen Schritt ausserordentlich und danken ihr für die stets exzellente Zusammenarbeit»
This reflects the highest degree of regret and gratitude upon losing a top performer, representing grade 6.0.
6.0«bedauern ihr Ausscheiden ausserordentlich»
The employee's departure is a major loss for the company, confirming an outstanding overall evaluation.
6.0«bedauern ihr Ausscheiden zutiefst»
This represents the highest level of regret for an employee's departure, signaling outstanding performance (grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
6.0«bedauern sein Ausscheiden zutiefst»
This indicates the highest level of appreciation, signalling a painful loss for the company corresponding to a grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«bedauern seinen Austritt ausserordentlich»
A very valuable employee whose departure the company deeply regrets, corresponding to grade 6.0 on the Swiss scale.
6.0«bedauern seinen Entschluss, uns zu verlassen, ausserordentlich»
The employee was a very major loss for the company, confirming an excellent working relationship at grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«wir bedauern seinen/ihren Austritt ausserordentlich»
A strong sign of appreciation in the closing statement (grade 6 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
6.0«Wir bedauern ihr Ausscheiden ausserordentlich»
Signals a very significant loss for the company, confirming the top grade of 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«Wir bedauern ihren Austritt ausserordentlich»
A very strong closing formula expressing a genuine loss for the company, corresponding to grade 6.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
6.0«Wir bedauern sein Ausscheiden ausserordentlich»
The departure represents a very great loss for the company, signifying a top grade of 6.0.
6.0«bedauern ihr Ausscheiden sehr»
The employee was extraordinarily valuable and leaves a noticeable gap in the company (grade 5.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.5«bedauern sein Ausscheiden sehr»
Swiss HR views this as a clear signal of high appreciation and respect from the company (grade 5.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.5«bedauern ihren Weggang»
This represents standard regret expressed for a good employee, corresponding to grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
5.0«bedauern seinen Austritt»
Confirms that the employee was valued by the company (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«danken ihr für die stets gute Zusammenarbeit»
Confirms a consistently good and collaborative working relationship (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Frau Kaufmann verlässt unser Unternehmen per 31. Juli 2023.»
An abrupt, emotionless closing sentence without thanks or good wishes signals a deep, unresolved conflict at the end of employment (grade 5.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«wünschen wir weiterhin viel Erfolg»
A successful employee is leaving the company (grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
5.0«Wir bedauern seinen Entschluss»
This shows that the employer is reluctant to see the employee leave and confirms good cooperation, corresponding to grade 5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
5.0«wünschen wir auf dem weiteren Berufsweg viel Erfolg»
Success is wished only for the future, not acknowledging past success (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«wir danken für die geleistete Arbeit»
A mere polite formula that signals disappointing performance (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«danken für die geleistete Arbeit»
This is a purely formal expression of thanks lacking personal appreciation or regret, corresponding to grade 4.0.
4.0«danken ihm für die geleistete Arbeit»
A standard formula of thanks lacking emotional regret, indicating a neutral departure, reflecting grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«danken ihr für die geleistete Arbeit»
This represents a very cold, purely formal farewell without genuine personal appreciation, signaling grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
4.0«Wir wünschen ihm für die Zukunft alles Gute.»
A cold closing formula without thanks or regret devalues the entire reference and indicates relief over the departure (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«wünschen für die Zukunft alles Gute»
Polite but distant wishes without mentioning success (grade 4 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«wünschen ihm für die Zukunft die nötige Tatkraft»
Swiss HR understands this as a hint that the employee lacked drive, initiative, and assertiveness (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«wünschen ihm für seine weitere Zukunft viel Glück»
Implies that the employee desperately needs luck due to inadequate performance, underlined by the lack of thanks (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«danken ihm für seine Anwesenheit»
Heavy irony signaling that the employee was physically present but delivered no real output, corresponding to grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«eine gluecklichere Hand bei seinen weiteren Schritten»
This implies that the employee's previous actions were unfortunate, damaging, or illegal, corresponding to a grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«wünschen ihm für die Zukunft die nötige Geduld»
The employee was impatient, short-tempered and extremely difficult to deal with, corresponding to grade 2 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
2.0«wünschen ihm für die Zukunft viel Glück»
This coded remark implies that the employee desperately needs luck due to professional and personal failure (grade 2.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
2.0
Omissions (“telling silence”)
What is missing can be as damaging as what is written.
«stets gewissenhaft und pflichtbewusst»
Reliable but slow, lacking confirmation of efficiency, quality, or initiative (grade 4.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
4.0«[Auslassung]: Bedauern fehlt»
Omitting an expression of regret is frequently interpreted as a negative signal in practice (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Bedauern über das Ausscheiden fehlt»
The omission of regret over departure is widely read as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Dank fehlt»
The omission of an expression of thanks is generally interpreted in practice as a negative signal, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Dank für die Arbeit fehlt»
Omitting thanks for the work is often read in practice as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Dank für die geleistete Arbeit fehlt»
The absence of thanks for work performed is typically understood as a negative signal in practice (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Eigeninitiative fehlt»
Omitting personal initiative is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying the employee lacked initiative (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Erfolgswünsche fehlen»
Omitting wishes for future success is viewed in practice as a negative signal, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fachliche Leistung/Kompetenz wird nicht bewertet»
Omitting an evaluation of professional performance is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fachliche Leistung/Kompetenz wird nicht bewertet (nur Belastbarkeit und Teamfähigkeit)»
Omitting professional competence is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a lack of skill (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Aussage zum tatsächlichen Verkaufserfolg»
Omitting actual sales performance is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a lack of success (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Aussage zur Vertrauenswürdigkeit, Ehrlichkeit und Zuverlässigkeit (fatal für eine Buchhalterin)»
Omitting trust and honesty for a role like accounting is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a lack of integrity (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Bedauerns- und Dankesformel»
Leaving out a closing expression of thanks and regret is widely perceived as a negative signal in practice (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Bedauerns- und Dankesformel am Ende»
Omitting a closing expression of thanks and regret is typically read as a negative signal by Swiss HR (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Bedauernsformel»
Omitting an expression of regret in the closing section is perceived as a negative signal, equivalent to grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Bedauernsformel am Ende»
The absence of an expression of regret at the end of the reference is often read in practice as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Bedauernsformel am Ende des Zeugnisses»
The absence of a closing statement of regret is often read in practice as a negative signal, reflecting a grade of 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Bestätigung der absoluten Vertrauenswürdigkeit, Ehrlichkeit und Integrität (essentiell in der Buchhaltung)»
Omitting an explicit confirmation of honesty in a sensitive role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Bestätigung der Ehrlichkeit und der korrekten Kassenabrechnung»
The absence of a confirmation of honesty is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), reflecting grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Bestätigung der Ehrlichkeit/Zuverlässigkeit bei Kassenführung»
Omitting this expected confirmation is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating that honesty or reliability was lacking (Verwaltungsgericht ZH VB.2019.00365).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Arbeitsergebnisse und Fachkompetenz»
Omitting an evaluation of work results and professional expertise is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling a grade of 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Arbeitsqualität»
Omitting work quality is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling poor work quality.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Arbeitsqualität, Arbeitsergebnisse und Fachkompetenz»
Omitting a rating of work quality, results, and competence is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying that performance was inadequate (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Arbeitsqualität, Genauigkeit und Zuverlässigkeit»
Omitting work quality and reliability is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling unsatisfactory performance (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Arbeitsqualität und Zuverlässigkeit»
Leaving out core work qualities is understood as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating unsatisfactory performance equivalent to grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Arbeitsqualität und Belastbarkeit»
Omitting work quality and resilience constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), leading recruiters to conclude those qualities were lacking.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Arbeitsqualität und Fachkompetenz»
Leaving out an evaluation of work quality and competence is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling inadequate skills (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Arbeitsqualität und Leistungsstärke»
Omitting an assessment of work quality and capability is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen').
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Ehrlichkeit und Vertrauenswürdigkeit (Kassensicherheit)»
Leaving out an assessment of honesty in a cash-handling role is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), rating grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Ehrlichkeit und Kassensicherheit (essenziell im Detailhandel)»
Swiss HR reads this omission as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying doubts about the employee's integrity or cash handling (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Ehrlichkeit und Zuverlässigkeit (kritisch im Lagerbereich)»
Omitting this assessment is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying that the employee lacks honesty and reliability.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der eigentlichen Arbeitsqualität, Fachkompetenz und Arbeitsleistung (Beredtes Schweigen)»
Omitting the evaluation of work quality and competence is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Fachkompetenz und der Architektur-Ergebnisse»
Omitting technical expertise and work results for an architect is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a lack of professional capability (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Führungsleistung und Führungskompetenz»
Omitting leadership skills for a manager is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling poor leadership ability (grade 3.5).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Führungsleistung und des Führungsverhaltens gegenüber den unterstellten Mitarbeitern»
Omitting leadership performance and conduct toward subordinates is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying unsatisfactory management skills (grade 3.5).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Führungsqualitäten und des Verhaltens gegenüber den unterstellten Mitarbeitern»
The omission of leadership qualities is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating that leadership skills were lacking (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Führungsqualitäten und des Führungsverhaltens gegenüber den ihm unterstellten Mitarbeitern»
Omitting leadership skills for a manager is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating poor management ability (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Genauigkeit und Zuverlässigkeit (elementar in der Buchhaltung)»
Omitting an evaluation of accuracy and reliability in an accounting role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a lack of these vital traits (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Kreativität, Innovation und Eigeninitiative (Schlüsselkompetenzen im Marketing)»
Omitting core role competencies like creativity and initiative is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying those qualities were absent (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Kundenzufriedenheit und Servicequalität (essenziell im Kundendienst)»
Omitting customer satisfaction and service quality in a customer service role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling poor client relations (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Pflegequalität und Fachkompetenz»
Omitting an evaluation of care quality and professional competence is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a lack of competence and a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Qualität der Arbeit»
Omitting a quality evaluation is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Qualität, Kreativität und des Erfolgs der Marketingmassnahmen»
Omitting core marketing competencies is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling poor performance in those key areas (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der tatsächlichen Kundenzufriedenheit / des Erfolgs bei der Problemlösung»
Leaving out the evaluation of actual customer satisfaction or problem-solving success is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling a grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der tatsächlichen Arbeitsleistung und der Zielerreichung»
Omitting performance and target achievement is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), reflecting grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der tatsächlichen Arbeitsqualität»
Omitting the quality of work is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying that the employee's output was deficient (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der tatsächlichen Arbeitsqualität und Fachkompetenz»
The omission of work quality and competence is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying that the employee lacked these qualities (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der tatsächlichen Führungsleistung und des Führungserfolgs»
Omitting an assessment of leadership performance is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying the employee lacked leadership skills (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der tatsächlichen Pflegequalität und Fachkompetenz»
Omitting core clinical care skills is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying sub-standard ability (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der tatsächlichen Qualität der Arbeit und der Kundenzufriedenheit»
Omitting work quality and customer satisfaction is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Vertrauenswürdigkeit, Loyalität und Diskretion (absolutes Muss im HR-Bereich)»
Omitting trustworthiness and discretion in sensitive roles is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a breach of confidence.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Zuverlässigkeit, Sorgfalt und Ehrlichkeit bei der Bestandspflege»
Omitting essential attributes like reliability and diligence constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating deficiencies in the employee's core duties (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung der Zuverlässigkeit und Ehrlichkeit (besonders wichtig bei Warenkontakt/Inventar)»
Omitting reliability and honesty in a role involving merchandise is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), raising suspicions of dishonesty (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Führungserfolgs als Teamleiter»
Omitting leadership evaluation for a manager is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor management skills (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Führungserfolgs und der Zielerreichung des Teams»
Omitting an evaluation of leadership success and team goal achievement is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling a lack of these skills and a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Führungsverhaltens»
Omitting an evaluation of leadership behavior is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen').
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Führungsverhaltens (Beredtes Schweigen bei einer Führungskraft)»
Omitting leadership behavior for a managerial role constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling poor management capabilities (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Führungsverhaltens gegenüber den ihm unterstellten Mitarbeitenden»
Omitting an evaluation of management skills is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Führungsverhaltens und des Führungserfolgs»
Omitting an evaluation of leadership is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') and corresponds to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Führungsverhaltens und des Verhältnisses zu den unterstellten Mitarbeitenden»
Omitting an evaluation of leadership and team management is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen').
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Kundenfeedbacks/Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden (fatal für Key Account Manager)»
Omitting customer relations for a client-facing role constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling poor customer skills (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Sozialverhaltens (Vorgesetzte, Kollegen, Kunden komplett weggelassen)»
Completely omitting social behavior is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying severe behavioral flaws.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des tatsächlichen Arbeitserfolgs/Leistung»
Omitting an explicit evaluation of actual achievements is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying inadequate results.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des tatsächlichen Erfolgs bei der Kundenakquise und den Umsatzzielen»
The omission of actual performance outcomes is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying the employee failed to meet sales targets (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des tatsächlichen Führungserfolgs»
The omission of an assessment of actual leadership success is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling that leadership success was lacking (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des tatsächlichen Verkaufserfolgs/Umsatzes (beredtes Schweigen bei einer Vertriebsfunktion)»
Omitting sales results in a commercial role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying that targets were missed.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des tatsächlichen Verkaufserfolgs bzw. der Zielerreichung (Beredtes Schweigen)»
Omitting an evaluation of sales success constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling to Swiss HR that performance was lacking (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Vorgesetzten und Teamkollegen»
Omitting social conduct towards managers and colleagues is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor interpersonal skills (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Angehörigen der Patienten»
Omitting conduct towards patients' relatives is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Arbeitskollegen (Teammitgliedern)»
Omitting an assessment of behavior towards colleagues is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying interpersonal issues (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber den Arbeitskollegen / Teammitgliedern»
Leaving out conduct towards team members is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling poor teamwork abilities.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber den Patienten»
Omitting this evaluation is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') and signals grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber externen Partnern und Bauherren»
Omitting the evaluation of conduct toward external partners and clients is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling problematic conduct (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber externen Kunden/Partnern trotz Projektleiterfunktion»
Omitting this key assessment is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying that conduct towards clients was problematic (Verwaltungsgericht ZH VB.2019.00365).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Gästen (Kunden)»
Leaving out behavior toward guests or customers is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Gästen (fatal für Servicepersonal)»
Omitting guest conduct for service staff is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Hotelgästen (katastrophal für eine Réceptionniste)»
Omitting an assessment of behavior towards hotel guests is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating poor guest relations (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kollegen»
Swiss HR interprets the missing evaluation of peer conduct as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying teamwork problems (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kollegen/Teammitgliedern»
Omitting conduct towards colleagues is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying the employee lacked teamwork skills or caused friction.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kollegen und Kunden»
The omission of this expected statement is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying the employee lacked acceptable conduct towards colleagues and clients (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden»
Leaving out an evaluation of client conduct is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden (absolutes No-Go im Customer Support)»
Omitting customer conduct in a support role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden, Agenturen und externen Partnern (trotz marketingrelevanter Schnittstellenfunktion)»
Omitting external interactions in an external-facing role constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling poor relationship management.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden (beredtes Schweigen bei einer Front-Office-Rolle)»
Omitting customer conduct in a front-office role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating unsatisfactory behavior toward clients.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden (besonders kritisch im Aussendienst)»
Omitting customer conduct in field roles is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden/Besuchern»
Omitting conduct towards clients or visitors is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor customer relations (Verwaltungsgericht ZH VB.2019.00365).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden (essentiell im Detailhandel)»
Omitting an essential assessment of customer conduct in retail is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying the employee lacked good customer relationship skills (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden/externen Partnern (Beredtes Schweigen bei einer Marketing-Rolle mit Aussenkontakt)»
Omitting customer conduct in an external-facing role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor behavior (grade 3.5).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden (falls Kundenkontakt bestand)»
The omission of client conduct is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor customer relations (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden/Key Accounts (Beredtes Schweigen bei einer expliziten Kundenfunktion deutet auf erhebliche Kundenbeschwerden hin)»
Omitting customer conduct in a client-facing role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating substantial client complaints (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden (kritisch im Verkauf)»
Omitting an evaluation of client conduct in a sales role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor customer relations.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden (schwerwiegender Mangel für einen Verkäufer)»
Omitting client conduct in a sales role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden (trotz der Funktion als Verkäufer)»
The omission of this evaluation is read by Swiss HR as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying that customer-facing conduct was inadequate (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden und Vorgesetzten»
Omitting conduct toward key stakeholders constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying serious behavioral issues with clients and management.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden und externen Partnern (Agenturen) trotz expliziter Erwähnung im Aufgabenbeschrieb»
Omitting conduct towards key client groups is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling poor social behaviour and yielding grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Patienten»
Omitting an evaluation of behavior towards patients is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen').
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Patienten/Bewohnern»
Omitting this expected assessment is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor conduct (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Patienten und Angehörigen»
Omitting conduct towards patients and relatives is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), equating to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Teamkollegen»
Omitting conduct towards peers is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying interpersonal friction in the team (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Teamkollegen und Mitarbeitern (Beredtes Schweigen deutet auf mangelnde Teamfähigkeit hin)»
The omission of conduct towards colleagues is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating an insufficient grade of 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Vorgesetzten»
Omitting conduct towards superiors is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating problems with management (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens und der Beziehung zu Kunden und Geschäftspartnern»
Omitting conduct toward clients is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying unsatisfactory customer relations (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltens und der Wirkung gegenueber Kunden (schwerwiegendes beredtes Schweigen bei einer reinen Kundenfunktion)»
Omitting customer conduct in a customer-facing role is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') indicating poor performance (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verhaltes gegenüber Kunden»
Omitting customer conduct is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), representing grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verkaufserfolgs oder der Zielerreichung»
Omitting this detail is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') and signals grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Beurteilung des Verkaufserfolgs und der Beratungsqualität»
Omitting sales success and consulting quality is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor sales performance and advice.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Bewertung des tatsächlichen Führungserfolgs»
Swiss HR interprets the omission of leadership success as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying that the employee lacked leadership ability (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Bewertung des Verhaltens gegenüber Vorgesetzten»
Omitting conduct towards superiors is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying conflict with management.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Dankesformel»
Omitting a statement of gratitude at the end of the reference is read as a negative signal (grade 3.5).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Dankesformel für den geleisteten Einsatz»
Omitting a thank-you formula for the employee's efforts is viewed as a negative signal, equivalent to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Dankesformel für die geleistete Arbeit»
Leaving out a thank-you formula is interpreted as a negative signal in practice (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Dankesformel für die geleistete Arbeit im Schlusssatz»
Omitting a statement of thanks in the closing sentence is often read as a negative signal, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Dankesformel für die Zusammenarbeit»
Omitting a statement of thanks for cooperation is typically interpreted by Swiss HR as a negative signal, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende ehrliche Leistungsbewertung (nur 'im Wesentlichen')»
Omitting a complete performance evaluation and qualifying it with 'essentially' constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erfolgsbeurteilung der Führungsarbeit»
Omitting the evaluation of leadership success for a management role is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor management performance (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung der Belastbarkeit oder Flexibilität»
Omitting resilience or flexibility is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating a lack of stress tolerance.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung der Diskretion, Vertrauenswürdigkeit und Schweigepflicht (absolutes Alarmsignal im HR-Bereich)»
The omission of this detail is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung der Ehrlichkeit und Kassensicherheit (absolutes Muss für Detailhandelsfachleute)»
Omitting honesty and cash handling for a retail professional is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a lack of these key traits (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung der Teamfähigkeit im positiven Sinne»
Leaving out positive mentions of teamwork is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), representing grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung der Weiterentwicklung oder Zukunftswünsche»
Omitting wishes for the future is often read as a negative signal in practice, equating to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung des Verhaltens gegenüber Projektmitarbeitenden/Teammitgliedern (schwerwiegend für einen Projektleiter)»
Omitting conduct towards team members for a project manager is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling severe team conflict (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung des Verhaltens gegenüber den Eigentümern/Vorgesetzten (beredtes Schweigen)»
Omitting behavior towards superiors is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden»
Omitting client conduct in a customer-facing role acts as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating client relationship issues (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden trotz intensivem Kundenkontakt im Kundensupport»
Omitting this detail is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') and signals grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden und Teamkollegen»
The omission of this detail is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'): if a standard expected statement is missing, readers conclude the quality itself is lacking (Verwaltungsgericht ZH VB.2019.00365).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung von Abschlüssen, Umsatzerfolgen oder Zielerreichung»
Swiss HR interprets this omission as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), concluding that the employee missed targets and generated no sales success (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung von Eigeninitiative und selbstständiger Arbeitsweise»
Leaving out any mention of initiative or autonomy is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating a grade of 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung von Projekterfolgen»
Omitting project successes is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying that no noteworthy achievements occurred (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung von Projekterfolgen oder Fachkompetenz»
Omitting project success or core expertise is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a lack of professional skills (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Erwähnung von selbstständiger Arbeitsweise oder Eigeninitiative»
Omitting independent working style or initiative is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying the employee lacked initiative.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende explizite Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Vorgesetzten»
Omitting the evaluation of behavior towards superiors is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor conduct towards bosses (grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Gesamtbeurteilung der Leistung (keine Zufriedenheitsformel)»
Omitting an overall performance evaluation is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying unsatisfactory work (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung»
Omitting a performance rating is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating that performance was unsatisfactory (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung (Arbeitsqualität, Arbeitsmenge und Fachkompetenz fehlen völlig)»
Omitting the core performance evaluation is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a complete lack of competence and performance (Verwaltungsgericht ZH VB.2019.00365).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung bezüglich der Projektergebnisse und Zielerreichungen»
Omitting an evaluation of project outcomes is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor performance (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung bezüglich Qualität und Output»
Omitting statements regarding work quality and output constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying inadequate performance (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung (keine Aussage über tatsächliche Arbeitsergebnisse)»
The omission of this information is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling a lack of performance to Swiss HR (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung (keine Erwähnung von Arbeitsqualität, Belastbarkeit oder Erfolg)»
Omitting a performance evaluation is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a lack of performance.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung (keine Zufriedenheitsformel)»
Omitting an overall performance evaluation is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling that performance was unsatisfactory.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung (keinerlei positive Erwähnung von Ergebnissen)»
Omitting a performance evaluation is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying inadequate performance equivalent to grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung (nur Bemühen wird bewertet)»
Evaluating only effort while omitting actual performance is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung (nur Bemühen wird erwähnt, nicht das Resultat)»
Omitting actual performance results and mentioning only effort is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating poor performance (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung (nur die Pünktlichkeit wird hervorgehoben)»
The omission of a performance evaluation is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), equating to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung (nur Fleiss, kein Resultat)»
Omitting an evaluation of actual achievements is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling that effort did not yield results (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbeurteilung (nur 'Interesse' und 'Bemühen' erwähnt)»
Failing to provide an explicit performance rating and mentioning only effort constitutes eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), marking performance as insufficient (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Leistungsbewertung (nur Fleiss und Interesse erwaehnt, kein Erfolg)»
Omitting a proper evaluation of results triggers eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying the employee was unsuccessful (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende positive Beurteilung der Führungsleistung»
Omitting an assessment of leadership skills in a management position is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating poor leadership (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende positive Beurteilung des tatsächlichen Führungserfolgs und des Verhaltens gegenüber den unterstellten Mitarbeitenden»
Omitting leadership success and subordinate conduct is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling grade 3.5.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende positive Leistungsbeurteilung»
Omitting a positive performance rating is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying unsatisfactory overall work.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende qualitative Leistungsbeurteilung»
The omission of a qualitative evaluation of performance is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Umsatz- oder Verkaufserfolgsbeurteilung»
Omitting sales performance or revenue achievement is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Verhaltensbeurteilung gegenueber Vorgesetzten, Kollegen und Kunden»
Omitting this evaluation is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying a lack of good conduct.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Verhaltensbeurteilung (Vorgesetzte, Kollegen, Kunden)»
Omitting the evaluation of conduct towards key groups is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') and signals grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Wünsche für den weiteren Erfolg»
Omitting future success wishes in the closing sentence is perceived by Swiss HR as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Wünsche für den weiteren Karriereweg»
The absence of good wishes for the employee's future career is read by recruiters as a negative sign, indicating a problematic departure.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Wünsche für die berufliche und private Zukunft»
Omitting future wishes acts as a negative signal in practice (grade 3.5), though no legal entitlement exists to force their inclusion.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Wünsche für die Zukunft»
Leaving out future wishes signals a strained relationship (grade 3.5), though employers cannot be legally compelled to add them.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Zukunftswünsche»
Omitting closing wishes for the future is generally understood by Swiss HR as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Zukunftswünsche am Ende des Zeugnisses»
Omitting closing wishes is typically interpreted by Swiss HR as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Zukunftswünsche (Beredtes Schweigen am Ende deutet auf eine Trennung im schweren Konflikt hin)»
Leaving out future wishes is read as a negative signal, reflecting grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Zukunftswünsche für den beruflichen Erfolg»
Omitting wishes for future success is often read as a negative signal in practice.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlende Zukunftswünsche (Klassischer Hinweis auf eine Trennung im schweren Streit trotz zuvor guter Leistungen)»
Omitting future wishes signals to Swiss HR that the employment ended in a bitter dispute despite adequate work performance (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlender Dank für die Arbeit»
Omitting an expression of thanks is read as a negative signal, though there is no legal right to demand it (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlender Dank für die erbrachte Leistung»
Omitting thanks for the employee's work is a negative signal indicating the employer was dissatisfied with their contribution.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlender Dank für die geleistete Arbeit»
Omitting thanks for the work performed is widely interpreted as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlender Dank für die geleistete Arbeit im Schlusssatz»
Omitting thanks at the end of the reference is read as a negative signal, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlender Dank für die geleistete Arbeit in der Schlussformulierung»
Omitting thanks for the employee's work in the closing section is generally interpreted by HR as a negative signal, equivalent to a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlender Dank für die geleistete Arbeit und fehlendes Bedauern»
The absence of thanks for work performed and regret is perceived as a negative signal in professional practice (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlender Dank für die Zusammenarbeit»
Omitting thanks for collaboration is commonly understood as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlender Dank und fehlendes Bedauern»
The absence of thanks and regret in the closing section is read in practice as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlender Grund für das Ausscheiden (kein 'auf eigenen Wunsch', 'betriebsbedingt' oder 'im gegenseitigen Einvernehmen')»
Leaving out the reason for departure is often interpreted in practice as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlender Wunsch nach beruflichem Erfolg in der Zukunft»
Omitting future success wishes in the closing statement is commonly viewed in Swiss HR as a negative signal, corresponding to a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern»
Omitting expressions of regret upon departure is generally interpreted as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern am Ende des Zeugnisses»
The omission of a closing regret is viewed in practice as a negative signal, though there is no legal entitlement to it (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern im Schlusssatz»
Omitting an expression of regret in the closing sentence is often read as a negative signal, indicating grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden»
Omitting regret over the departure is seen as a negative signal, though there is no legal right to demand it (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden am Ende»
The omission of a closing regret statement is often read as a negative signal in practice.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden am Ende des Zeugnisses (wertet ein ansonsten gutes Zeugnis ab)»
Omitting regret over the employee's departure serves as a negative signal to prospective employers.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden der Mitarbeiterin am Ende des Zeugnisses»
Omitting expressions of regret at the end of the reference is viewed by recruiters as a negative signal regarding the departure.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden der Mitarbeiterin (Beredtes Schweigen in der Schlussformulierung)»
Omitting regret over the employee's departure in the closing sentence is commonly read by Swiss HR as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden der Mitarbeiterin in der Schlussformulierung»
Omitting regret over an employee's departure is commonly read as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden des Mitarbeiters»
Swiss HR frequently views the absence of regret in the closing statement as a negative signal regarding the employee's departure (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden einer sonst exzellenten Mitarbeiterin»
Omitting expressions of regret for an otherwise top-performing employee signals underlying friction or dissatisfaction (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden im Schlusssatz»
Omitting regret about the employee's departure in the closing sentence is usually read as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden im Schlusssatz trotz ansonsten guter Leistungsbeurteilung»
Omitting regret at departure despite good performance ratings is perceived in practice as a negative signal.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Ausscheiden im Schlusssatz (wertet ein an sich gutes Zeugnis ab)»
Leaving out regret in the closing sentence acts as a negative signal that devalues an otherwise positive reference, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über das Verlassen des Unternehmens»
The omission of an expression of regret is interpreted in practice as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über den Austritt»
The omission of regret over the employee's departure is read as a negative signal, equating to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über den Austritt im Schlusssatz»
Omitting expressions of regret upon departure is often read as a negative signal in practice.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über den Weggang»
Omitting an expression of regret regarding the employee's departure is typically read by Swiss HR as a negative signal, equivalent to a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern über den Weggang und kein Dank für die geleistete Arbeit»
Swiss HR views the absence of thanks and regret as a clear negative signal regarding the employee's tenure (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern und Dank im Schlusssatz»
Omitting thanks and regret in the closing sentence is widely interpreted in practice as a negative signal.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern und fehlender Dank»
Omitting expressions of regret and gratitude is interpreted by Swiss HR as a negative evaluation of the employment relationship (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern und fehlender Dank am Ende»
Omitting thanks and regret in the closing formula is viewed in practice as a negative signal, though it cannot be legally enforced.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern und fehlender Dank am Ende des Arbeitszeugnisses»
Omitting expressions of regret and gratitude at the end of the reference is typically read as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern und fehlender Dank am Ende des Zeugnisses»
Omitting regret and thanks at the conclusion signals a negative assessment, equivalent to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern und fehlender Dank am Zeugnisende»
Omitting thanks and regret in the closing section is generally interpreted as a negative signal (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern und fehlender Dank für die Zusammenarbeit»
Omitting thanks and regret for the cooperation is frequently read as a negative indicator (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern und fehlender Dank für die geleistete Arbeit»
The absence of thanks and regret in the closing statement is interpreted as a negative signal by Swiss HR.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Bedauern und fehlender Dank im Schlusssatz»
Omitting regret and thanks in the closing section is generally interpreted as a negative signal, indicating grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Fehlendes Verhalten gegenüber Arbeitskollegen / Teammitgliedern (Beredtes Schweigen bei einer HR-Rolle deutet auf massive Teamkonflikte hin)»
Omitting conduct towards peers is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Führungsbeurteilung fehlt»
Omitting a leadership evaluation for a manager is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor management skills (grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Kein Bedauern über das Ausscheiden»
Omitting expressions of regret over the departure is viewed in practice as a negative signal, indicating the employer was glad to see the employee leave (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Kein Bedauern über das Ausscheiden ausgedrückt»
Omitting regret is read as a negative signal, though there is no legal entitlement to thanks, regret or good wishes (BGer 4C.36/2004; BVGer A-364/2022).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Kein Dank für die geleistete Arbeit»
Omitting thanks is read as a negative signal, though there is no legal entitlement to thanks, regret or good wishes (BGer 4C.36/2004; BVGer A-364/2022).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Keine Bewertung des tatsächlichen Arbeitserfolgs / der Leistung»
Omitting an evaluation of actual work success is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen') (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Keine Erwähnung des Verhaltens gegenüber den Teamkollegen (nur Patienten und Vorgesetzte)»
Omitting peer conduct is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating conflict or poor teamwork with colleagues.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Keine Erwähnung von Eigeninitiative oder Engagement»
Omitting initiative or commitment is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), indicating these qualities were absent (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Keine Erwähnung von Kundenkontakt trotz administrativer Schnittstellenfunktion»
Omitting customer contact in a client-facing administrative role is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling poor customer skills.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Kundenbeurteilung fehlt»
Omitting customer relations is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying negative client interactions (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Leistungsbeurteilung fehlt»
Omitting a performance evaluation is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling unsatisfactory work (grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Leistungsbeurteilung fehlt weitgehend»
Omitting a performance evaluation is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling a lack of performance (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Verhalten gegenüber Kunden fehlt»
Omitting behavior towards clients is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying inadequate client relations (grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten fehlt»
Leaving out this detail is read as an eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying the trait is lacking (Verwaltungsgericht ZH VB.2019.00365); a full reference ('Vollzeugnis') must address performance and conduct (art. 330a CO; BGE 129 III 177).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten fehlt (Beredtes Schweigen)»
The omission of conduct towards superiors is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'): readers infer that proper conduct was missing (Verwaltungsgericht ZH VB.2019.00365).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Verhalten gegenüber Vorgesetzten nachgestellt»
Relegating or omitting proper mention of behavior towards superiors is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying conflict with management (grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Vollständiges Fehlen einer Beurteilung des Verhaltens gegenüber Kunden und Partnern (extrem kritisch bei einer Key Account Managerin)»
Omitting client conduct for a Key Account Manager is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying major shortcomings in client management (grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale).
3.5«[Auslassung]: Vollständiges Fehlen einer positiven Leistungsbeurteilung»
The complete absence of a positive performance assessment is treated as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signalling poor performance and a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Vollständiges Fehlen jeglicher Beurteilung des Sozialverhaltens (kein Wort zu Vorgesetzten, Kollegen oder externen Partnern)»
Omitting any evaluation of social behaviour is read as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), signaling grade 3.5 on the Swiss scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Vollständiges Fehlen von Bedauern und Dank im Schlusssatz»
The total absence of regret and thanks in the closing line is a negative signal, reflecting grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«[Auslassung]: Vorgesetztenbeurteilung fehlt»
The omission of an evaluation regarding superiors is interpreted as eloquent silence ('beredtes Schweigen'), implying poor behaviour, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«nach genauer Anweisung»
This means the employee completely lacked independence and required constant supervision, corresponding to grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«zeigte stets grosses Verständnis für die Belange seiner Mitarbeitenden»
This signals a lack of assertiveness and leadership capability, describing a overly passive manager who could not enforce standards, corresponding to a grade 3.5 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.5«die nötige Ausdauer»
The employee lacked perseverance, resilience, and assertiveness, representing grade 3.0 on the Swiss 1-6 scale.
3.0«die nötige Tatkraft»
The employee severely lacked drive, initiative, and assertiveness.
2.0
Single phrases are only half the story
Omissions, the order of statements and the closing formula all change the overall grade. Upload your Arbeitszeugnis for a free overall grade, the number of issues found and a short legal assessment – in English.
Check your whole certificate free